The Key of Solomon the King
How to read this edition
Solomon did not write this. The Clavicula Salomonis is a family of related manuscripts in Latin, Italian and French, circulating in Europe from roughly the sixteenth century onward, with roots in older Greek and Byzantine magical material. Mathers's 1888 edition is a composite: he worked from seven British Museum manuscripts — chiefly Add. MSS. 10862, Lansdowne 1202 and 1203, Harleian 3981, King's 288 and Sloane 3091 and 1307 — and assembled a single readable text from versions that disagree with one another.Record
He says so openly. His footnotes mark which chapters exist in only one manuscript, which paragraphs are omitted elsewhere, and where the Latin and French diverge. Chapter IX of Book II, the formation of the Circle, survives in Add. MSS. 10862 alone. This is a scholar's apparatus, and it is the most trustworthy thing about the volume.Method
A composite assembled from disagreeing witnesses is a text no practitioner before 1888 ever held. Is Mathers's Key a restoration of the tradition, or a new member of it?Open Question
One caution for citation: the page metadata at sacred-texts.com credits this translation to A. E. Waite. It is Mathers. Waite's Book of Ceremonial Magic is a separate work, and a hostile one — he thought most grimoires were rubbish and said so at length.Correction
What Is Where
Book I — The Operations 18 chapters
Book II — The Workshop 22 chapters
Book I Chapter III tells you to wash and robe "as is rehearsed in Book II," to exorcise the fire "as laid down in the Second Book," and to say prayers "which thou wilt find in Book II." Twelve pages in, the text has already sent you forward eighty pages. The Key cannot be read straight through and worked; it has to be held whole.
Is that structure a failure of arrangement, or a deliberate gate — a book that will not yield to a reader who has not already read all of it?
Book I opens by commanding fear of God, adoration, contrition of heart. Book II closes with instructions for animal sacrifice to Demons — white beasts to the good spirits, black to the evil. The same volume, forty chapters apart.
Is that a contradiction the compilers did not notice, a corruption of an originally pious text, or an entirely coherent worldview that we have simply lost the ability to read?
Stolen goods, invisibility, spoiling another man's hunt, garters for speed, a carpet that answers questions, buried treasure, love, mockery and deceit. Set beside the lofty framing, the actual catalogue is domestic, petty, and occasionally malicious.